2x2 Prioritization Matrix Template
Help your team base important decisions on weighted criteria with the 2x2 Prioritization Matrix Template.
Trusted by 65M+ users and leading companies
About the 2x2 Prioritization Matrix
The 2x2 prioritization matrix, or lean prioritization approach, is a tool that helps teams decide what to tackle next in their product backlog.
The method is a quick, efficient way for your team to focus on features most likely to be valuable to your customers versus effort actually taken to deliver those features.
Any team applying lean start-up methodologies can also use this matrix to make decisions and figure out where to focus their efforts in relation to where the risk is, or where the most valuable opportunities are.
If you need a matrix that accommodates different phases or iterations, and granularity of effort versus value (from high to low), you may be looking for a 3x3 prioritization method.
What is a 2x2 prioritization matrix?
This model is a priority matrix that can help product managers determine priorities, and is also suitable for anyone leading projects and initiatives who needs help deciding what their team should focus on. A 2x2 prioritization matrix typically has 4 segments representing varying levels of effort and value:
Big bets, aka “do it next”: Product features or tasks that are valuable but difficult to implement.
Quick wins, or “do it now”: Product features or tasks that are valuable and easy to implement.
Time sinks, aka “don’t do it”: Product features or tasks that aren’t worth investing in right now.
Maybes or “do if or when there’s time”: Low-value tasks that can be returned to later on.
The value parameter considers the business value of your product feature or idea. The effort parameter considers resources (like time, money, people) that may be needed to finish the tasks outlined.
When to use the 2x2 prioritization matrix
Agile development teams can use the 2x2 prioritization matrix to decide which features, fixes, and upgrades to work on next. This framework can help you decide the least amount of features you need to launch a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), or prioritize tasks for an upcoming Agile sprint.
Whether you’re a product manager or leading a new business initiative, it’s worth considering how each idea informs each of these elements:
Acquisition (gaining new customers)
Activation (when customers understand the value of the product or feature)
Reach (how many customers are impacted)
Revenue (the profitability of a product or feature)
Retention (returning, active customers)
Virality (influence or “stickiness” of the product or service)
Teams can also use the matrix to make business decisions such as:
New markets worth pursuing and prioritizing
Campaigns and messaging to invest in
Departments, functions, or capabilities worth building or expanding on next
Ideally, a 2x2 prioritization matrix helps your team create boundaries around what is realistic to tackle, and develop clarity and consensus around what’s most important for success, versus nice-to-have or unnecessary.
Create your own 2x2 prioritization matrix
Making your own 2x2 prioritization matrix is easy. Miro’s virtual collaboration platform is the perfect canvas to create and share. Get started by selecting the 2x2 Prioritization Matrix Template, then take the following steps to make one of your own.
Step 1: Define your business value
Ideally, tie the value of a product feature or initiative to how your organization drives value. Discuss with your team whether you’re looking at strategic, customer, or financial value. Edit the value parameter text as needed.
Step 2: Define your risks
Risks usually come in the form of implementation (complexity, cost, or effort) and business-related (failure to adapt to change, compliance needs, or operational issues). Consider both. Discuss with your team which are more likely to impact plans. Edit the risks text as needed.
Step 3: Edit your priority categories as needed
You can also label the quadrants “Challenge,” “Implement,” “Reconsider,” and “Possible.” Brainstorm with your team about what action words best fit your product or initiative.
Step 4: Confirm and reach a consensus on priorities
The matrix brings reason and logic to a team dynamic. Everyone may have different opinions when first planning, but ideally, you want to end sessions with shared language: “low hanging fruit,” “hot zone,” “special investments,” “possible but low-value,” “more research before committing,” “only if extra budget and time are available,” and “not right now.” Think of these phrases as a spectrum between effort and value. Make decisions and investments accordingly.
Get started with this template right now.
Google Cloud Architecture Diagram Template
Works best for:
Software Development, Diagrams
Use the Google Cloud Architecture Diagram template to clearly visualize the deployment of your application and allow you and your team to optimize processes. The GCP template gives you a great overview of your application architecture, and it helps you to iterate quickly and better manage your application development, deployment, and documentation. Try it out and see if it works for you.
Likert Scale Template
Works best for:
Desk Research, Decision Making, Product Management
It’s not always easy to measure complex, highly subjective data — like how people feel about your product, service, or experience. But the Likert scale is designed to help you do it. This scale allows your existing or potential customers to respond to a statement or question with a range of phrases or numbers (e.g., from “strongly agree” to “neutral,” to “strongly disagree,” or from 1 to 5). The goal is to ask your customer some specific questions to turn into easy-to-interpret actionable user insights.
Likert Scale Template
Works best for:
Desk Research, Decision Making, Product Management
It’s not always easy to measure complex, highly subjective data — like how people feel about your product, service, or experience. But the Likert scale is designed to help you do it. This scale allows your existing or potential customers to respond to a statement or question with a range of phrases or numbers (e.g., from “strongly agree” to “neutral,” to “strongly disagree,” or from 1 to 5). The goal is to ask your customer some specific questions to turn into easy-to-interpret actionable user insights.
Milestone Chart Template
Works best for:
Project Management, Strategic Planning, Project Planning
When your team is collaborating on a large project, keeping track of the many tasks and multiple timelines can be a challenge. That’s why you need a milestone chart. These visual representations of important project events will make it simple for your team to stay on schedule and reach goals on time. And it’s so easy to get started — just determine the major milestones, use our template to create a milestone chart, and define the key dates and deliverables each milestone will require.
Impact/Effort Matrix Template
Works best for:
Project Management, Strategic Planning, Prioritization
Growing organizations have countless to-do’s and only so many hours in a day (or weeks before a big launch) to get them done. That’s where an impact effort matrix comes in. It gives you a quick visual guide to help prioritize your tasks and know exactly what’s worth doing. Using our template, you can create a matrix that organizes your activities into four main categories: quick wins that are low effort, effort-intensive projects that provide long-term returns, fill-ins that are low effort but low value, and time-wasters.
MoSCoW Matrix Template
Works best for:
Ideation, Operations, Prioritization
Keeping track of your priorities is a big challenge on big projects, especially when there are lots of deliverables. The MoSCoW method is designed to help you do it. This powerful technique is built on a matrix model divided into four segments: Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won’t Have (which together give MoSCoW its name). Beyond helping you assess and track your priorities, this approach is also helpful for presenting business needs to an audience and collaborating on deliverables with a group of stakeholders.